data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de68c/de68c365f523ce3b2c07b6ffa8abb60c8cfc59c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95a63/95a63f9a1d392ce02a6562d123d1c04c4a2b217f" alt=""
Ah, coffee. Without that delightfully bitter black kiss in the morning I fail to become a fully functional human being. Maybe it's an addiction. Maybe I once took a job as a barista for the endless supply of free drip coffee. Maybe when I consider remaining childless, a 9 month stretch without it weighs heavily in the argument. Whatever. I love it and I'm not going to stop drinking it for anything short of bleeding ulcers or pregnancy.
That said, the environmental (and social) impacts of coffee growth can be pretty horrific, and I can't really consider myself an environmentally conscious person without examining how drinking coffee affects the rest of the world. After all, I may be lazy, but I try not to be unethical. First, a brief note about choosing your battles in terms of green living, that I will try to expand coherently in another post. I am not a subsistence farmer who shuns all technology. You probably aren't either. We do things all the time that are less than ideal for the environment. We also make small compromises every day that are not really good for the environment, but just shift the pressure from one area to another. At this very moment I am typing this and listening to Sen. Lindsay Graham be slightly condescending to Elena Kagan on a computer. So: 1 machine running vs 2 (computer and tv). Rather than typing and distributing this on paper, it will be uploaded to a blog, so trees saved, but at the cost of the mining and manufacture of the laptops, desktops, and smart phones from which you all are reading and from which I am typing. I'm not in a hurry to move into a yurt and grow all my own food (lazy), but I'll buy sustainably grown food. I'm not in a hurry to give up coffee, but I try to buy coffee that lines up with my environmental and social views. So don't get discouraged and give up on the whole green thing because your carbon footprint can't squeeze behind the decimal. Mine doesn't, either. But I'm working on it.
On Fathers’ Day, I wrote a bonus entry for the blog, to honor the memory of my Dad (and to set me up for today’s post). That post is about how Dad was the catalyst for me thinking about sustainability and for my working toward living a more sustainable lifestyle.
He wasn't the only reason I'm the way I am -- far from it. But he's probably the most important factor for my green leanings. Next week, I'll write about what I think is the first runner up.
If you’re reading this, you likely also aspire toward a sustainable lifestyle. I want to know why you hold those aspirations, and I want to know if you think you’re making headway toward living up to those aspirations.
I want you to comment on this post. Or at least think about commenting.
There are two reasons I want you to comment. I'll state them simply and then explain each in just a bit more detail.
Commenting helps you build your own understanding:
There’s compelling research on how people learn (and see this and this), and one of the key findings of that work is this:
A "metacognitive" approach to instruction can help students learn to take control of their own learning by defining learning goals and monitoring their progress in achieving them.
Commenting to help us build understanding in others:
Giving us some feedback also has the potential to help others do what you've done. If you can tell us the things you've done and the things you've read or watched or created that deepened your understanding and catalyzed your actions, then maybe we can help others do the same.
So, why are you green?
When I first started trying to shrink my carbon footprint (about 20 years ago), I was doing so largely because I felt guilty for the damage I was doing through my daily activities. That’s a pretty good reason, but it’s not the most important one for me anymore.
Of course, there are lots of reasons – that guilt; lower utility, travel, and grocery bills; unclutter your life and your home; get in better shape by walking and biking and more. All these reasons matter a great deal, but, for me, the most important reason to shrink my footprint is to learn, and to learn for action.
Twenty years ago was seven jobs, six houses (the first was a rental), and two apartments ago. I’ve gone from being a single guy renting a tiny house to a married father of two living in a smallish house (with some bigger residences in between). I’ve had jobs with long commutes, with walkable commutes, to the commute I have now where I walk downstairs to my computer. All of my jobs in that stretch of time have required at least a bit of work-related travel, but I’m now doing more than ever.
All of those jobs have been about helping people understanding the world from a scientific perspective. Studying your carbon footprint and how to reduce it can be a great strategy for building understandings of your place in the world.
For more than half of the twenty years I’ve been trying to reduce my footprint, I’ve used calculators like the one from the Global Footprint Network to gain a sense of what my ecological footprint is, or to figure out what my carbon footprint is (which is a slightly different concept) I've used the Nature Conservancy's calculator. If you don't know about carbon or ecological footprints, these links are great places to start. Both give good overviews of the related science, and both allow you to change variables and immediately see how that changes your footprint (although the impact of changing airplane travel wasn't working on the Global Footprint Network when I fiddled with it this afternoon).
During the 20 or so years I’ve been thinking about my lifestyle in terms of a carbon footprint, the size of that footprint has gone up and down. That's not surprising based on the changes in my life over that time. It's disappointing to me that it's not gone down consistently and I hope to redirect the trend in footprint size downward.
But I also know that just changing my footprint isn't really going to reduce climate change very much if that's the end of what I do.
However, is is a logical place to start. A key idea informing my work as an educator is to use the local to understand the global. That's central to place-based learning and place-based learning is, in my opinion essential to effective Earth system science education generally and to developing climate literacy specifically. And what's more local than you?
Reduce your carbon footprint. You probably know many of the basic things that need to be done (and if you don't looking back through previous entries in this blog can get you well on your way). But don't let reducing your footprint be an end in itself. Use the study of the environmental impacts as a gateway to understand broader climate and environmental issues.
It can be depressing to visit the different footprint calculators and see what happens when you reduce everything as much as the software allows. You can't get to zero. You can't get to a footprint small enough to be sustainable if you live in the United States (on these calculators) because governments have big footprints, and you contribute to that whether you like it or not.
So, you can't get to zero or to sustainable by yourself. You need to be a part of something bigger. Getting to sustainable requires collective action. Figure out how to reduce your own footprint as much as possible and help others do the same, then (or at the same time) work to change the larger society.
What ideas do you have to nurture that collective action?
I thought this post was going to be about joining a CSA rather than container gardening, but it turns out it is going to be about both. I did not have Trish's rural upbringing. My only successful attempt at gardening was as a 6-year-old, when I planted (and harvested!) radishes under the careful supervision of my mother. While Mom comes from a family of truly talented gardeners, and has a green thumb herself, we never had an extensive garden. I grew up mostly in the North Western exurbs of
I am a convert to sustainable foods, rather than a cradle locavore. I never really thought about local or sustainable agriculture until I got to college. Metro
The trick to doing these right (read: cheaply) is to split them with someone. Even if you don't, if you are already committed to sustainably farmed local produce, CSAs can be your most economical option. They're good for the farmers because they get a portion of their income up front, which helps with expenses at the beginning of the growing season. It's good for you because you are helping to ensure the success of local agriculture and because you get an entire season's worth of produce (in my case 24 weeks! 24!) for less than a month's rent. It works out to less than $20/ week for a huge amount of awesome produce. The catch is that it depends on your ability to write a sizable check up front. Several of the local CSAs have optional payment plans, but the price often goes up slightly. I like the 1-time full payment plan. It's like paying car insurance every 6 months instead of monthly; it saves you money in the long run.
A CSA share fits with the "lazy" in the blog title perfectly. I should point out here that my attempts at plant care have been abysmal since the radishes. In high school I managed to kill a small plant that is like a cactus, but needs less watering. I killed it dead. If it doesn't meow or bark at me for food, it won't get fed. Consequently, I am not confident in my ability to feed myself with a container garden. With a CSA, you get varied, seasonal produce and you don't have to grow it yourself. All you have to do is make a weekly trip up to the farm and bag it yourself. And oh, what a bag it is. There were at least 8 different kinds of salad greens this week. Stuff I haven't even heard of. So I got to happily munch on bok choi leaves and radishes for lunch today. Some super-spicy greens made it into my salad last night, and probably will tonight as well.
Way back in 2001, I attended a conference in Costa Mesa, California. In order to save some money, and to meet new folks, I used the conference website to find a roommate for the conference. My roommate was from India, but had done had earned his Ph.D. in the States several years earlier. He’d not been back to the US in about a decade.
2001 was at the height of the rolling blackouts. In the years since Anil had been in the US, bottled water had become popular too. Our hotel room offered bottled water for a few dollars per liter. Though I didn’t know Anil until we met at the conference, I could easily tell he was put off by certain things he was seeing.
He asked me, “Don, what’s happened to the infrastructure in this country?” I asked him what he meant, and he said that when he was here in the early 1990s, we didn’t need bottled water and the electricity was very reliable. Indeed, I thought. I struggled to come up with an answer grounded not in issues of scarcity, but rather in issues of market manipulation. Americans, it seemed to me, were basically duped.
I didn’t wish to count myself among the ranks of the duped, and I think there are negative consequences of bottled water. In my holier than thou way, I’ve rarely bought or had bottled water. Or have I?
I never buy and only very rarely consume what we think of as bottled water, but I do buy and consume other bottled (and canned) liquids that are mostly water. The most common is diet cola – it’s my caffeine delivery system and I drink a lot of it – the equivalent of four cans a day is not unusual for me. Some of it comes from cans, but most of it comes from 2 liter plastic bottles.
The cola is bottled not too far away, and I return the bottles and cans for recycling (of course!). That eases my conscience somewhat, but if I think I’m better than those bottled water drinkers because my water is carbonated and caffeinated, well, I think I’m fooling myself.
I also enjoy a certain class of beverages made with hops and barley and such. For the beer, I like to try different varieties, some from near and some from far. Fortunately, there’s some great beer made in Upstate New York, so I can improve my carbon footprint by buying local and liking it!
I want to reduce the carbon footprint of my beverage habits – that means replacing at least some of the cola with tap water and maybe cleaning up the home-brewing supplies.
Perhaps most important is tracking the consumption – if you want to change something, a common successful step is knowing what you’re doing right now. People who lose weight and keep it off, for one example, are much more likely to weigh themselves regularly than people who don’t. Another example is having the electric meter for a household in an obvious place makes electricity use drop substantially. So, I’ll keep a running tally and see if I can shrink the footprint of what I drink. And maybe think about weighing myself more regularly too.
I’m unsure if we’ll ever end up in the situation Anil feared we were in when he returned to the US after a decade away and saw those rolling blackouts and the new prevalence of bottled water. I don’t like the scare tactics that can go along with such a vision, and I think there’s genuine reason to hope that we won't go there. I’ll be personally better off avoiding the high dose of diet cola I now consume. If I can bring myself to get my brewing supplies cleaned up and back in operation after a decade gathering dust, I’ll be drinking better, cheaper, lower carbon footprint beer (but please don’t expect me to revive a lousy old refrigerator to store it in). That all sounds much cheerier…